Talk:Origin (band)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

The text reads more like an advertisment than an encyclopedic article. - Quirk 12:29, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

They are currently on tour...  ????--217.247.7.234 09:49, 27 January 2006 (UTC)Reply


This text should be removed and re-written. Origin deserves an high quality objective article. 09/03/06 (Yann)


This text was copy+pasted from what looks like the band official website, if not Relapse Records' website. This should be re-written more objectively. The capitalisation of the band names is a dead give away that this was copy+pasted. --Nargos 02:54, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply


I've made an attempt to wikify the article and make it more neutral. It'll probably still need some work, but it's less of an advertisment now. Raven_1959 13:05, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I tried to neutralize a little bit of it, but it's way too slanted to simply be modified. Also, I'm not as familiar with the band as some, so I had to interpret what was alreay there. Hopefully someone more dedicated to them will try to give it a much needed overhaul.

Reworking edit

I'll try to rework this page sometime. I've just added in pages for all 3 albums, trying to put in a little more than just bare bones info Dace59 16:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I added the info box on the side DemonOfTheFall27 23:18, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:OriginMainPicTemp.jpg edit

 

Image:OriginMainPicTemp.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:OriginMainPicTemp.jpg edit

 

Image:OriginMainPicTemp.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Best band ever!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.22.141.200 (talk) 09:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Looking forward for new album! Anyone heard of a title yet? Or release date?4.22.141.200 (talk) 09:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

LONGSTRETH

I can't believe John Longstreth doesn't have his own page.

Broken link edit

The link to the supposed homepage of the band is misleading. --89.245.127.218 (talk) 16:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bot-generated peer review edit

Origin (band) edit

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 04:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Note: I've copied this from the automated peer review archive for February 2009. Huntthetroll (talk) 18:33, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sources edit

Interviews

Cannibaloki 20:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles

Cannibaloki 22:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Origin (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Origin (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:22, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply