Talk:Orgel's rules

	Evolutionary biology portal This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Last addition (Orgel's First Rule) comes from my email correspondence with him. To wit: "According to Francis Crick, my first rule states, roughly, that whenever a spontaneous process is too slow or too inefficient a protein will evolve to speed it up or make it more efficient. Leslie Orgel" I probably haven't set the tone of this addition particularly well. It might be a good idea for a better writer than I to take a brush at this article. Perhaps, even, to split Orgel's First and Second rules into different articles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.25.246.104 (talk • contribs) 10:02, 14 December 2005

You can't use email correspondence as a source. Richard001 (talk) 08:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Article needed? edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This looks like something that would go well in the biographical article. Is there any case for having a separate one here? Richard001 (talk) 08:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic