 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Definition is buried edit
This article hides the actual definition of what 'Organic unity' is somewhere well into the third sentence. It might be nice to refactor the page in such a way that the definition is more prominent and then the supporting material can occur later. 118.90.25.165 (talk) 06:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- The Reference.com article on organic unity is a copy of this article. All editors/bot operators: please be aware of this, so that the copyright issue doesn't rear its ugly head. Wikipedia is beginning to be cited by reputable websites all across the internet (c.f. DrugBank's inclusion of Wikipedia info). Fuzzform (talk) 21:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Says very little edit
Good grief, this is a horrendous article that disappears up its own entrails and says virtually nothing about Organic Unity itself! 91.108.91.165 (talk) 06:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Unreliable edit
This article should be tagged with a notation that it is not reliable and should not be cited. It is not [yet] up to the same standard as most other philosophical entries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekachakra (talk • contribs) 13:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC)