Talk:Ore, East Sussex
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Wugapodes in topic Requested move 20 March 2020
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
|
|
Untitled edit
The article name doesn't match the definition. --Anvilaquarius (talk) 18:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 20 March 2020 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved — Wug·a·po·des 22:37, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Ore Valley → Ore, East Sussex – Undo 2010 move by vandal. Article is about the village/suburb, which maps and other sources call "Ore". Certes (talk) 00:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment. User:Crouch, Swale is usually the topic expert for these. 62.165.200.10 (talk) 01:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support "Ore Valley" might be the name of the surrounding area but indeed its just "Ore" on OS maps, most Google results seem to show "Ore Valley" as the college or a housing development. Unless the name is preferred by WP:NATURAL or WP:COMMONNAME, WP:WIAN is indeed just "Ore" per OS. I don't see evidence that this move was vandalism though. Crouch, Swale (talk) 06:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- That move may indeed have been a good faith edit, which why I'm bringing it to RM for third opinions rather than taking it to WP:RMTR. It may or may not be relevant that the editor who moved the article had other UK place moves reverted and was indef blocked as a vandalism-only account the same month. I should add that the proposed title is WP:NATURALDIS to match Battle, East Sussex; Rye, East Sussex; etc. Certes (talk) 12:31, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- OK, I see it was ABCDavis who made the original move and then Dpmuk removed the unnecessary disambiguation. The current title appears to be natural disambiguation while the proposed is comma one. Those like Battle and Rye probably don't have common enough alternatives to satisfy NATURAL so per WP:UKPLACE we comma disambiguate. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:25, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- That move may indeed have been a good faith edit, which why I'm bringing it to RM for third opinions rather than taking it to WP:RMTR. It may or may not be relevant that the editor who moved the article had other UK place moves reverted and was indef blocked as a vandalism-only account the same month. I should add that the proposed title is WP:NATURALDIS to match Battle, East Sussex; Rye, East Sussex; etc. Certes (talk) 12:31, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 19:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.