 | A fact from Ordot Dump appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 March 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 18:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Guam in the territory's attempt to seek U.S. Navy contributions to cleaning up Ordot Dump, a former landfill and Superfund site? Source: https://www.reuters.com/business/legal/scotus-sides-with-guam-160-million-ex-navy-dump-superfund-case-2021-05-24/
Created by Featous (talk). Self-nominated at 21:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC).
New enough and long enough. QPQ not needed; fewer than five credits. Article is quite interesting. Featous, I'd like to see the Reuters piece cited inline on the sentence that mentions this as a unanimous verdict, as there is no citation on the sentence with the hook fact, but that's all that is needed for approval of this page. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:55, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Reuters citation added to the sentence in question. Thanks! - Featous (talk) 13:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Pinging @Sammi Brie: to complete review (i.e.: add tick if warranted). – Reidgreg (talk) 15:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
This is why I like being pinged, Featous... Tick granted. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 16:41, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
- Pinging @Sammi Brie: to complete review (i.e.: add tick if warranted). – Reidgreg (talk) 15:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
- Reuters citation added to the sentence in question. Thanks! - Featous (talk) 13:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
