Talk:Operation Freshman/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

   There's a few things with this section that need to be fixed. Of particular note:

• In the infobox, "N/A" should be replaced with "Unknown" for German strength and casualties, per MilHist MoS
• Instead of "British Defeat", should it not be "German Victory"
• The References need publication location

1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

2. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

3. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

4. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

5. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Just one minor comment - would it be possible to get an image of the plant in 1943?

6. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Just a few MoS things that need to be fixed. After that, it should be good to go. Cam ^(Chat) 20:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)