 | Operation Ferdinand has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 14, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from Operation Ferdinand appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 February 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Operation Ferdinand/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 08:39, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Comments to follow over the next couple of days. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 08:39, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
This article is looking to be in great shape, I have only noted a few things, most of which should be straightforward to address. I made a few minor ce tweaks as I went through as well. Zawed (talk) 10:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- 1) Holt and Lloyd are missing publisher's location.
- 2) Latimer has a double colon in the publisher's location.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- 1) "originally threatened by Vendetta" - no context for Vendetta? Presumably another deception plan?
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Thanks! I'll get onto this later! --Errant (chat!) 18:18, 10 May 2016 (UTC) @Zawed: I think I've addressed these issues. Vendetta was a sub-plan of Zeppelin so I called it out when introducting that plan. --Errant (chat!) 13:49, 13 May 2016 (UTC)