Talk:Operation Double Eagle

11 June 2018

These edits [1] made by User: A bicyclette without any edit summaries are misleading and repetitive. No WP:RS is given stating that this was an operational failure, Platt said it was a success and Krulak disagreed so Inconclusive is the correct result. We don't state ships and aircraft in an Infobox. The overlong discussion of the result in the introduction is unnecessary, the US almost always enjoyed fire supremacy in Vietnam and arguably the buildup of the supporting arms was observed by the PAVN/VC and made them leave the area. The same applies in the Aftermath. I revised all this but A bicyclette immediately reverted it: [2] A bicyclette also needs to cite refs properly, Shulimson is already there as a ref, while you can't just add bare urls as references. Mztourist (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)