Ontario Highway 400A has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 4, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 400A/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Neonblak (talk · contribs) 17:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
I will have a review up shortly.Neonblak talk - 17:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Lead
- Lead is well written and appears to be a good summary of the article. The infobox is informative, and the picture appears to be of correct public use tag.
Route description
- "Highway 400A is a short highway with a narrow grass median for the majority of its length." - The length of the road isn't included in this paragraph like it was in the lead. I think a better opening sentence would read something like this: "Highway 400A is a 1.1-kilometre (0.68 mi) 400-series highway located in the Canadian province of Ontario."
- I would then follow that with a comprehensive sentence such as: "The unisigned freeway includes a narrow grass median for the majority of its length, and features a speed limit of 100 kilometres per hour (62 mph)."
- "On an average day, roughly 11,900 vehicles use it." clunky... maybe say "On average, the highway is used by approximately 11, 900 vehicles daily."
History
- "In 1950, the freeway was extended north through Barrie..." - To make it easier for the reader, I would clarify that "...the freeway was extended north through the town of Barrie..." and then link to the town. I know that it is linked in the infobox, but not everyone reads that.
- Same with Crown Hill. Is that a town? If so, it seems that when I looked it up, it appeared to be name Springwater instead.
That is all I saw that needed to be addressed. I can't check the items in the GA Toolbox at the moment, but should be able to later on this evening. Thank you for your efforts, and I look forward assisting you in gettin this promoted.Neonblak talk - 18:19, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Everything looks good, thank you. I will go ahead and pass this ! Neonblak talk - 23:01, 4 September 2014 (UTC)