This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
It's artificial and against at least the conventions of a classical encylopedia to treat the author and his single surviving work and testimony to his life separately. In fact, the Artemidorus article is better and covers exactly the same ground. This article is worse. I've removed the worst parts--such as the constant misunderstanding of how ancient texts were and were not organized. And I took the "editions" section and replaced it with the editions section of Artemidorus, which actually lists editions, not a single English translation.
I suggest we delete this and combine with Artemidorus anything worth saving.
