Talk:OmniMark
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I work for a company which uses OmniMark. When I get more exposure to the language, I hope to improve and expand this entry. I cna already see that it is a powerful tool, but I still prefer perl :-)
This article looks like an advertisment. edit
It contains favorable comparisons of Omnimark to other languages without substantiating the claims.
Psismondi (talk) 00:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC) Still looks like an advertisement. unitas (talk) 15:13, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
It still looks like an advert and contains questionable references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.42.22.52 (talk) 08:50, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
After a restoration of the article, I've taken out the marketese, and added some cites. (The only comparisons left are with Perl, noting factually both that the regular expression syntax is more English-like, and that the language is less used than Perl or Ruby.) About to add some history; contributions from folks more familiar with the language are welcome. JohnMarkOckerbloom (talk) 15:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)