Talk:Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr./GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Yllosubmarine in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Will start reviewing shortly. Cheers, Ricardiana (talk) 04:53, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Criterion 1: well-written edit
Looks very good for the most part. A couple of small comments:
- "and is now considered a member of the Fireside Poets." --Speaking as an ignorant reader, does this mean that the Fireside Poets are a posthumously-denoted group, or that they were recognized in their day but OWH was not at the time considered a member? (I realize you'll make this clear later, but it should be clear to a general reader in the lead.)
- "Written fifteen years after The Autocrat, this work's tone was more mellow and nostalgic than its predecessor." - Seems POV - do you have a source for this assessment? Ricardiana (talk) 05:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Criterion 2 - factually-accurate and verifiable edit
Excellent here. Ricardiana (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Criterion 3: broad in its coverage edit
A look through Google Books and MLA shows nothing important missing. Excellent here also.
Criterion 4: neutral edit
Neutral - good.
Criterion 5: stable edit
Very stable and a nice collaborative atmosphere.
Criterion 6: illustrated, if possible, by images edit
Looks good here, too.
Verdict edit
Excellent work on the part of everyone involved. Congratulations on putting together a Good Article! Ricardiana (talk) 05:37, 8 May 2009 (UTC)