Old Nassau was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 22, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Old Nassau appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 June 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Old Nassau/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 23:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Another nomination made as part of a mass dump, in an attempt to obtain WikiCup points. QF on broadness. Only two sections - composition and lyrics change. Nothing else? No analysis, critical response, complaints that aren't related to sexism? No history between 1859 and 1987? Notable performances? Final paragraph states "Other universities followed Princeton's lead.", but there's no indication in the cited sources that they were changing because of Princeton's changes to Old Nassau, so this is OR. Final sentence is completely uncited. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)