Talk:Oculolinctus

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2604:2D80:6984:3800:0:0:0:EBA2 in topic Animals that lick their own eyeballs

Paraphilical edit

"Paraphilical" is not a recognised word and should be replaced with "paraphilic". I can't do it because of some lame Visual Editor thing that doesn't work in my browser. Not clear how to edit in proper text markup mode. 91.157.52.176 (talk) 14:46, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Done, thanks.  Sandstein  17:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Factual accuracy edit

This is allegedly a hoax and at least some of the references in this article have issued corrections. This article needs major cleanup, and may warrant either deletion or, if the notability is sufficient, a rewrite to be about the hoax itself. Oren0 (talk) 08:24, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

how can it be 'allegedly' a paraphilia? edit

Because I find it arousing and there are probably other people too out there, everything can potentially be a fetish to someone. Maybe it is 'allegedly common' or something but it exists. 37.201.225.81 (talk) 20:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fixed that for you. 2605:6000:F4CC:BE00:B95B:9E43:CB91:3C4A (talk) 20:12, 10 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
Unrelatedly... wow, I've got an IPV6 ID? Sweeet! 2605:6000:F4CC:BE00:B95B:9E43:CB91:3C4A (talk) 20:13, 10 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect redirection edit

The redirection from oculophilia to oculolinctus seems the wrong way round to me: the subset should direct to the superset. Oculophilia also includes philias like Dacryphilia, eyepatches, cum-in-eye shots, spectacles, missing eyes, contact lens play, and mere appreciation of the sexiness of these mirrors to the soul. This redirection makes no more sense than would redirecting "Breast Fetishism" to "Erotic Lactation". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:F4CC:BE00:B95B:9E43:CB91:3C4A (talk) 20:52, 10 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Animals that lick their own eyeballs edit

I’m wondering if that deserves a brief mention in this article, since it technically is also “eyeball-licking” (the literal definition of the title). Unlike in the human case, this is common and normal for many other species, particularly those without eyelids, for instance see: [1] 2604:2D80:6984:3800:0:0:0:EBA2 (talk) 02:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply