This article is within the scope of WikiProject Objectivism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ObjectivismWikipedia:WikiProject ObjectivismTemplate:WikiProject ObjectivismObjectivism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
The Objective Standard was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 19 February 2010 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Objectivist periodicals. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
For some reason the lede to this looks a little funny, especially the first sentence. Perhaps we would be better off titling it "List of Objectivist periodicals"? TallNapoleon (talk) 21:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
That would suggest the article would be in list format, whereas the better-formed parts of it are currently a narrative and should probably stay that way. But I have no doubt that the lead could be improved. --RL0919 (talk) 21:41, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
As discussed previously on the Objectivism cross-talk page, there is a concern that some of the individual articles may lack notability for a separate article. There is also a continuous history for several of these publications, which makes it easier (and less redundant) to discuss them together in a single article. Finally, there are some less prominent periodicals for which articles have never been created due to lack of article-level notability, but which are significant enough to be discussed in a combined article, thus allowing the encyclopedia to provide information about them. --RL0919 (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
I support blanking-out and re-directing. --Karbinski (talk) 14:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
I support blanking-out and re-directing. --Emb021 (talk) 16:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Result: The merger has been completed with the individual articles now redirecting to this one. --RL0919 (talk) 16:55, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
