Talk:Oakwood tube station

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Vincent60030 in topic External links modified

Highest station claim edit

The trivia stating that Oakwood is the highest station on the Piccadilly line is incorrect. Google Earth shows Cockfosters Station to be at 100m above sea level. DavidUri 12:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure where Google Earth gets its altitutde data, but a check at the Ordnance Survey's Get-a-map site shows that Cockfosters station is between the 95m and 100m contour lines so the Trivia statement is clearly wrong. The statement was originally added on 2 May 2006 by User:IsarSteve and I have queried the source and the odd statement about the Urals mountain on his talkpage. --DavidCane 15:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
The information has two sources.. I personally remember seeing the bronze plaque in the 1970s & the details also appear in the Piccadilly Line Managements (East Area) 1993 publication: Piccadilly Line Extension The Diamond Anniversary. It may not be the highest point on the Piccadilly Line, but in 1933 London Transport thought it was!!! --IsarSteve 07:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the response. Both a strange statement to want to commemorate on a plaque and odd that they would apparently get it wrong. I wonder what promoted the decision to erect the plaque - perhaps a visit from a Soviet delegation to see the new extension. --DavidCane 00:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Second most northerly? edit

Epping, Theydon Bois, Cockfosters, High Barnet and Chesham are all further North than Oakwood.
See http://homepages.tesco.net/houseofsteel/geoff-files/sillymaps/tubegeo.jpg for evidence
Unless of course you meant second most northerly Piccadilly station —Preceding unsigned comment added by --AsparagusTips (talk) 14:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)62.60.98.134 (talk) 14:44, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oakwood tube station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Checked :) VKZYLUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 10:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply