Talk:Nuvell Financial Services

Latest comment: 11 years ago by 128.135.100.111 in topic Merge into GMAC

Merge into GMAC edit

I'm suggesting that this article be merged into General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC) since the article is a stub anyways and GMAC pretty much considers Nuvell a separate entity by name only.Jgera5 18:01, 27 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. ESPN is a seperate entity to ABC in name only, but it still has it's own article, doesn't it? The ownership is hardly relevant. Furthermore, Nuvell Employees are paid under the Nuvell entity -- not the GMAC entity. Many people who are financed by Nuvell are not aware they are owned by GMAC. The businesses are not intertwined. --Wolf530 00:14, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I agree with the suggestion to merge. This stub hardly seems to merit its own page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silverwolf17 (talkcontribs)

If we're going to do that, I suggest we go ahead and start WikiProject:Merge all subsidiary businesses. We're going to need to merge any and all subsidiary companies of GMC (Chevrolet, Cadillac, Saturn, Buick, Saab, Ditech, etc.) into that article since they're seperate entities "in name only." All subsidiary business of Ford (Volvo, Mercury, etc.) into that article. While're at it, we should start on the businesses of the Disney company, because they own a few media companies we're going to need to merge into that article. Since we're following on this logic, we should go ahead and merge together U.S. and the articles on Puerto Rico, Guam, and any other protectorate states. Heck, why bother with having articles on the 50 states at all? I don't see how they merit their own pages considering that they are not even seperate entities in the sense of a nation. Can anyone think of any other sets of articles we should get started on first, after we merge Nuvell and GMAC? --Wolf530 (talk) 20:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply


clarify -- "ever increasing costs of funds" makes no sense — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.100.111 (talk) 15:57, 17 October 2012 (UTC)Reply