Talk:North Weald Airfield
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the North Weald Airfield article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on North Weald Airfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120611030826/http://www.nwflying.co.uk:80/ to http://www.nwflying.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:41, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Development controversy edit
I think 'Development controversy' section should be removed or extended. My understanding is that the original development plans referenced in the article were shelved long ago and superseded by [1]. It feels that this section speaks of a local campaign that is not of a general interest. If there's a current controversy about the existing development plans, would be good to add details and references to news about it. PaulT2022 (talk) 23:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Also, https://www.eppingforestdc.gov.uk/cabinet-13-march-north-weald-development/ PaulT2022 (talk) 15:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Aces High edit
Might make sense to add details about Aces High as a historical resident, but I couldn't find any sources other than [2]. Adding a good citation for The Crystal Maze filming mention would also be useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulT2022 (talk • contribs) 05:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)