Talk:No. 50 Squadron RAF
Latest comment: 13 years ago by AustralianRupert in topic Consistency of terminology
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Temp Page edit
Temporary replacement page started at Talk:No. 50 Squadron RAF/Temp - feel free to chip in.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- I've just moved this as it stood to the No. 50 Squadron RAF article proper to remove the big ugly copyvio tag. Nick-D (talk) 07:19, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- By moved Nick-D meant copied. I deleted the original article under CSD G6 and moved the temp page to the original title, thus losing the copyvio from the history. 09:11, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Consistency of terminology edit
Hi, good work on rewriting this article. Just a minor point. The article uses interchangable terms: First World War and World War I as well as Second World War and World War II. Either is fine, in my opinion, but consistency is important. I suggest that if World War I is used that World War II should be, or conversely if First World War is used, Second World War should be. Anyway, I'll leave it up to the original contributor to decide. Finally, if you are considering taking this to GA, the lead will need to be expanded. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)