Talk:Nippon Chemi-Con

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can the quality of Nippon Chemi-Con's be confirmed?

I don't know of a reputable reference, I mean when is an article published on the quality of capacitors? It's definitely widely agreed though that Chemi-con is a high-quality manufacturer.[1]70.146.67.84 (talk) 17:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality of Information edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The "reputation" isn't really a verifiable source.

Also, while I don't necessarily doubt that the NCC caps are used in all the motherboards sited, we should have some evidence of it before posting it as fact. In addition, dates with that evidence should also be used.

The entire line about being "poised" is complete marketting spiel. Future looking prospects should be left to PR articles unless they somehow made the news. Such as new product introductions (from Engineering rags) or news they invested $40,000,000 in a new plant. That could be included.

Lastly, I like NCC! I just pulled 20 caps from a 20 year old amplifier that are still measuring to spec. I don't want to disparage them, just want to improve the quality of the article.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eriksq (talk • contribs) 16:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic