Talk:Nikolai Glushkov

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nikolai Glushkov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061122183938/http://www.jamestown.org/publications_details.php?volume_id=24&issue_id=1931&article_id=17910 to http://www.jamestown.org/publications_details.php?volume_id=24&issue_id=1931&article_id=17910

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Death

User:Ad Orientem The wider context is quite clear - deaths of Russians in the last 10 years are being investigated, and it would be a glaring omission here. Widefox; talk 19:33, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, but BLP applies here. Any claims of a controversial nature must be backed by citations to reliable sources. I do not doubt what you wrote, but that is WP:OR and or CRSYSTAL balling. It can be re-added when it's properly referenced. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:37, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

User:Ad Orientem What words do you think I wrote? My words use a BBC source. I presume that's good enough for you? As he's dead, BLP is for whom? Widefox; talk 19:41, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

I assumed you were referring to my redaction here of unsourced claims about his death and possible links to Russian involvement. Am I wrong? Also BLP applies to the recently deceased generally for at least six months and sometimes up to a year if they were controversial figures. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:46, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

I see that you have re-added the material with an RS citation. That works. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:48, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

OK, I stand corrected on BLP, thanks. But seriously, you've conflated what I wrote (sourced) and what whoever wrote it first (unsourced). As the news is all over [1] [2] it wasn't hard to source the investigation into a link. Widefox; talk 19:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Sorry if that looked precipitous. I am reviewing nominations at ITNC and referencing is one of the things we hold to high standards for articles being considered for linking on the main page. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

WP:BLP

WP:BLP still applies here. This is not a reliable source. Try something better. This is probably a false claim to my knowledge. My very best wishes (talk) 21:43, 17 March 2018 (UTC)