Talk:Nickel compounds
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Graeme Bartlett in topic The page is too long
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Infographic? edit
I think the header section needs some kind of infographic. I'm not sure if a periodic table would be appropriate, or maybe a summary of the numerical properties of nickel referred to in the paragraphs (atomic radius, charge, etc.). The position on the periodic table is important, and a visual representation of that would be more efficient than describing it. Even a cutout of the few elements surrounding it (rather than the entire periodic table) would help. Any thoughts? Elriana (talk) 20:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
The page is too long edit
I think it is better to move the tables of nickel compounds in the page nickel compounds to list of nickel compounds. --Leiem (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:25, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- Agreed Pelirojopajaro (talk) 16:12, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- I have now split or removed these tables to other articles, so the page is much shorter. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:06, 24 February 2019 (UTC)