Talk:Nicholas Hasselbach

Latest comment: 2 years ago by SL93 in topic DYK nomination

New article edit

Added content welcomed and new sources needed. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 21:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 06:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Created by Gwillhickers (talk). Self-nominated at 22:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.
Overall:   New enough, long enough, no other eligibility issues. Sourcing is good, and thank you for the direct link to the sources supporting the hook, which check out. Earwig check reveals nothing of concern. The hook is interesting. QPQ done and accurate. It's a great article, and I've made some reasonably minor clarification/copyediting amendments (Gwillhickers, please check those are OK!). From my perspective, good to go. Chocmilk03 (talk) 03:26, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply