Talk:Next Generation EU
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recovery fund: Own article needed edit
Now that we all look on coalition break in Italy it is time to make the Recovery fund an own article, am I right? The question I wanted to have answered was:
What are the concrete constraints for a country using money of it? I wanted to compare them to the constraints for the ESM as Matteo Renzi gave that comparison as reason.
I think there is (besides maybe what words are used in the media) no reasons why there is a german article about it:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiederaufbaufonds_(EU)
while in the german Wikipedia we do not yet have an article about the Next_Generation_EU ! --78.35.168.183 (talk) 16:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Misleading sentence about the EU refusing to help Italy and the virus spreading from Lombardy to the rest of Europe edit
Hello, There are several problems with the sentence: "EU member states reacted unilaterally and refused to come to Italy's assistance to fight the massive virus outbreak in Lombardy eventually causing its spread across Europe." 1) It is misleading on a political level. Things were not so simple. 2) It is misleading in suggesting that Lombardy contaminated the rest of Europe. 3) the quoted article provides is not a solid evidence for such bold 8and highly innacurate) claims — Preceding unsigned comment added by Posillipo200 (talk • contribs) 18:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Dreaming about fiscal integration edit
@Clemens Schmillen: You write that the NGEU is "considered the first step into a fiscal integration in Europe".[1] Where in the cited source is that stated?--Anders Feder (talk) 13:07, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
.jpg){kind=link}
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:36, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
The Rule of Law Section edit
Sounds very much like a loose essay rather than a Wikipedia entry. 213.134.186.180 (talk) 21:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- ...and it's not really up to date. 213.134.186.180 (talk) 21:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC)