Talk:News bureau

:Protection

If the Reuters "news bureau" on second life is a major part of this article, I can see why it's protected. Flowanda | Talk 06:57, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

This article isn't protected, nor is Reuters, nor is Second Life. Are you suggesting it should be changed? It's just a one-sentence mention, as is CNN's attempt to do the same thing, in the section about nontraditional bureaus. I'm not sure what it proves. Perhaps that they're scrambling, or trying to create buzz, or pander to something they don't understand? Who knows? It would be nice to have a more comprehensive account in the article of the rise, function, and decline of traditional news bureaus as the news business evolved. One has this image of a guy in a trench coat and tie and no hat in the snow standing in front of Red Square with a microphone talking about what happened in the Kremlin that day. That used to be considered the core of serious journalism. Wikidemo 18:19, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on News bureau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071024164148/http://secondlife.reuters.com/ to http://www.secondlife.reuters.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 18 February 2018 (UTC)