Talk:Newlib

Notability

I note that the article has been marked by a notability template without a proper text in this talk page. Why is it not notable? For the reason of mechanically applying a policy? While reliable secondary sources is a good thing, the fact that I surfed to here in order to find an alternative to the bloated malformed C98 libc is an indication of the inherent notability of the article ― one might reasonably wish to have 2ndary sources on topics in general in WP. However: for software, this shouldn't be erected a requirement in order to allow the article a continuing existence, because the software users tend to communicate with the primary source of the software, and otherwise be almost silent. I believe the notability policy should be executed by a certain care as regards to software, so in order to provocate awareness of this care, I'm now, without searching consensus, provocatively going to remove the notability template. ... said: Rursus (bork²) 18:16, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Spelling of the subject of this article

Is it "newlib" or "Newlib"? Both are currently used. --Mortense (talk) 22:59, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Newlib. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090302160344/http://www.codesourcery.com:80/sgpp/features.html to http://www.codesourcery.com/sgpp/features.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110708165815/http://www.cm3tools.com/CodeRedWiki/CLibrary to http://www.cm3tools.com/CodeRedWiki/CLibrary

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Newlib. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160322224323/http://uclibc-ng.org/wiki/matrix to http://www.uclibc-ng.org/wiki/matrix

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

newlib-nano looks dead

The newlib-nano had last code change on 2014-04-06 and it's website (http://32bitmicro.com/) does not exist any more; it looks positively dead. Maybe it should be noted when referencing it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.110.38.73 (talk) 10:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)