Talk:New York State Route 17J

Latest comment: 15 years ago by TwinsMetsFan in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 17J/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Great job! ~~ ĈĠ Simple? 23:07, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
    This is a horrible review. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
    I tend to agree. On a similar note, I'm not sure why this article even exists as a standalone; its alignment and history are identical to NY 394. – TMF 23:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply