Talk:New Paris, Pennsylvania

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

I removed the following text in the Gravity Hill section as it is utter nonsense and I can't find any source, nevermind a verifiable one, that anyone has measured the hill: "There are claims that nobody knows for sure what the cause is, or that it could be a gravity warp in the earth. The theory that it is an optical illusion created by the surrounding landscape has been disproved with GPS units with elevation capability. Balls, cars and water really do roll from a lower point in elevation to a higher point of elevation on the road." 137.99.236.218 (talk) 20:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Paris, Pennsylvania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply