Talk:New Mexico Mounted Patrol

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 99.32.150.12 in topic Flawed reference links

Creating article edit

I am in the process of creating the page and gathering information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DustoneGT (talkcontribs) 23:26, 15 October 2009‎

Oct 30, 2013 edit

There were several dispute tags on the page, but nobody justified most of them here on the talk page. Feel free to add them again, but give people something to work with to improve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.123.203.26 (talk) 04:30, 31 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oct 30, 2013 edit

Facts in dispute were referenced to secondary sources, and additional secondary sources were added. Some wrong facts were cleaned up, and remaining dispute tags were removed. Article could still use some improvement in the history area, but current facts are cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.123.203.26 (talk) 04:48, 31 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

The sourcing is still weak, and still prone to relying on primary sources. Surely there are books which have discussed this stuff over the century? --Orange Mike | Talk 17:30, 31 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Mexico Mounted Patrol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Flawed reference links edit

Most, possibly all, of the article's reference links seem to be "dead links" leading to "404 pages" and idle domains.

The passages making assertions about "criminal elements in the legislature" would benefit from some backing from multiple reliable mutually supportive sources -- or lacking that some more neutral phrasing that doesn't make assertions about legislative criminality without sourced elaboration.

--99.32.150.12 (talk) 15:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply