Talk:New Melones Dam/GA1

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Shannon1 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anarchyte (talk · contribs) 09:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this. --Anarchyte 09:04, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Main review edit

Overall comments/Misc edit

Not to worry, though. That blog post was on 1 December 2013 and on 6 October 2013, the the article had all the "violated" content.

Lead edit

  • Everything is fine here  

Specifications edit

  • 594 ft (181 m) above the streambed.
According to the reference, it's 541.0 ft (164.89 m)

Background and construction edit

Controversy edit

  • For the references in the first paragraph, they all seem to be bunched together at the end, do you think you could change that?

Overall review edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:   (Pass)

Very nice article, short, sharp and shiny. I'm going to pass this because the issues I mentioned before are minor and can be fixed in an edit. Passed:  --Anarchyte 09:59, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ah, what a surprise! I was out for the July 4th weekend so didn't expect to see this article reviewed then. I'll go in now and make the fixes you mentioned. Thanks! Shannon 04:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Reply