Talk:New Hampshire Business Review
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Cooljeanius in topic Notability
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in New Hampshire may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Notability edit
This publication appars to fail the general notability guidelines for lack of significant coverage. It also appears to fail the standards for reliability of WP:RS to the extent that it essentially reprints news releases and does not engage in significant verification of business claims. --Bejnar (talk) 06:44, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Not true with the latter; it has several staff writers including Bob Sanders, whose articles are quite respected in the state. Defining notability of a publication by how much coverage it gets in other publications/outlets is always tricky. It is distributed, and read, statewide and has a robust online presence, including a daily newsletter that reaches thousands. (I have no connection it it, by the way, although I'm a newspaper reporter in New Hampshire). - DavidWBrooks (talk) 11:04, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- The Concord Public Library carries physical copies of it in its periodicals room and reporters from it have contacted me before for comment for articles they were doing original reporting for. Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 23:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)