Talk:Never have I ever

Latest comment: 2 years ago by FormalDude in topic "Well I Never" listed at Redirects for discussion

Comments edit

Don't you hate those people who add a cleanup tag and then abandon the article? Well, I have two points. 1)The article is full of firsthand experience (see WP:OR) masquerading as encyclopedic knowledge. 2)I'm going to bed, but I don't want to abandon the problem. Deltabeignet 07:33, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

I'm not trying to be a jerk here, but really, how do you create a "pop culture" kind of article? Something like this isn't the type of thing to have sources, but that isn't to say that its not the type of thing to exist on Wikipedia.Crazekid 21:34, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Does my edit of 7 Jan suit? MikeMorley 21:28, 7 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Trivia edit

I think we should make sure the trivia section doesn't get out of hand - those can get really big and bloated quickly. --Awiseman 21:52, 10 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

We should, but apparently Beyond My Ken has never heard of WP:INDISCRIMINATE.  — Scott talk 11:32, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Purpose edit

Does anyone else think the "purpose" of the game can be eliminated? After all, it's already stated in the introduction. SujinYH 16:45, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Actually I think it's ok. It doesn't really say as much in the intro. --Awiseman 17:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Changes edit

I copy-edited the page and moved it to it's more common title.  hmwith  talk 14:17, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

There is a variant used as a stripping game.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.2.42.248 (talk) 16:23, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Do you have any source or even any particular reason to think this is the more common name? I've certainly never heard of "Have I Never" but I could believe it was common if there was anything to back that up.

More importantly, these don't sound like the common rules. I find it hard to believe the hokey "10 finger" thing is especially common (how does that even work if you're drinking at the same time anyways?). And it's missing several standard rules which are important to make it a workable game.

62.232.55.118 (talk) 14:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have never edit

I've never heard of the fingers variant, but everyone I know in the UK calls this game 'I have never', and we just say 'I have never xxxx' instead of 'never have I ever xxxx'. Still the same drinking / getting to know you game. I don't how how you make it show up on searches though, so couldn't do that.

Also, just wondering, does the example have to be 'had anal sex'? I know the same is 99% sexual questions (the other 1% being questions about crime), but maybe a more family-friendly example could be thought up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JaffaCakeLover (talkcontribs) 17:31, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Never edit

Although it is non refereced/has no citations, i still think this article is a keeper. It's not poorly written, somewhat light and the sort of subject thats harder to cite. IAmTheCoinMan (talk) 10:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Some links to sources that can be cited edit

I don't have the time to incorporate this information bu someone who wants to save this article from deletion should check out:

Also, please REMOVE the original research. It's just inviting the deletion debates. THANKS OfficeGirl (talk) 15:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Improvement edit

I'll improve the article along the lines of how I did to Kings (see the page before & after). I hope to get around to this in a few days. hmwithτ 19:09, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Useful quote edit

"Games such as never have I ever "reveal interesting things about the participants and help build friendships", according to one American college student"

This is a really, really useful quote. Thanks for putting it in. 67.71.112.140 (talk) 23:44, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Non-drinking version edit

Would it be too out of line to point out that it can be done without drinking? Especially since the ten-fingers rule is a useful substitute for drinking until you pass out? Reiisi (talk) 03:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Never Have I Ever. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Never Have I Ever. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Snakes and Ladders which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:46, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Well I Never" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Well I Never. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 1#Well I Never until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. ––FormalDude talk 06:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply