Talk:Nesta Webster

The John Birch Society

Tee John Birch Society is not an anti-semitic organization.

They do, however, read Webster's books, so I added that back in. For a long time I had one of their catalogs which had a couple of her books in it. Or see [1]Шизомби 00:50, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Nesta Helen Webter

• Can someone please help create "links" & "redirects" to :

Nesta H. Webster and

Nesta Helen Webster?

Thanks Ludvikus 01:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Done -- Hawaiian717 01:22, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Question regarding description of Nesta Webster

Would someone present evidence which establishes that Nesta Webster should be considered a genuine "historian" -- as she is described in this Wikipedia article? User:Nameless

Good point, un-named user - "controversial" augmented by "discredited". --Ludvikus 00:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Question regarding a publication attributed to Nesta Webster

I spent a considerable amount of time and energy trying to track down a copy of The Need For Fascism in Great Britain but was never able to find one. Furthermore, I contacted more than a dozen British academics who specialized in British fascism and a couple who have written extensively about Nesta Webster. None of them had ever seen a copy either. No copy exists in any British Library. Anyone have any confirming factual evidence that Nesta actually did write such a publication? If not, that comment within the article should be removed.

Nesta H. Webster

The article/page should be Moved to the above. The common usage includes the Middle initial.

However, I cannot do it as it requires the assistance of a Wiki Administrator.

Yours truly, --Ludvikus 11:52, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Nesta Helen Webster

On second thought, after re-examination, I notice that the preferred usage by the Library of Congress is to spell out her middle initial. So the Move should be to the Full name: [2]. --Ludvikus 12:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Webster n02.jpg|thumb|right|Young Nesta H. Webster

I do not know the Copyright status of this WEB image. I believe it's in the Public domain. Can someone please do the research on that and make the appropriate posting? Thanks. --Ludvikus 12:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC)