| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nesomys narindaensis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Nesomys narindaensis has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 2, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Hypogeomys australis, Nesomys narindaensis, and Brachytarsomys mahajambaensis are the only known extinct rodents of Madagascar? | |||||||||
GA Review edit
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Nesomys narindaensis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 20:53, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am reviewing this article. It is very technical (to say the least) but it does seem like there is an effort to make the information accessible. This article is the best it can be, given the limited material.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
Clearly and concisely written.
- B. MoS compliance: Complies with required elements of MOS
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources: Reliable sources
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects: Sets the context
- B. Focused: Remains focused on the topic
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 20:53, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! Yes, it's quite technical with only teeth to describe. We do actually have a skull for this one, but for some reason the describers chose not to say anything about that skull except a few measurements. A pity, because a description of the skull would at least have been a little less technical than one of the molars only. Ucucha 21:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)