Talk:Neopentane

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 1234qwer1234qwer4 in topic "Neopentyl" listed at Redirects for discussion

extremely flammable edit

Is neopentane more flammable than other volatile hydrocarbons? Otherwise I wouldn't call it 'extremely' flammable. --79.243.238.194 (talk) 21:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

I would say yes, due to the high C/H ratio, and it being a germinal dialkyl. Plasmic Physics (talk) 22:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
But neopentane has the highest autoignition temperature among the isomeric pentanes (see in the articles). And, compared to the lower gaseous hydrocarbons, a neopentane/oxygen mixture needs a higher oxygen ratio to be explosive. What both should make it less dangerous again... --79.243.248.187 (talk) 18:21, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
The first thing is right, maybe due to the fact that all outer carbons are primary carbons which are less reactive towards radical reactions than secondary and tertiary ones. But the explosion hazard depends on if you have an air-in-neopentane mixture (which should not be explosive) or an neopentane-in-air mixture, which can explode very easily because it doesn't need much neopentane for the stoichiometric combustion. So the second thing is rather a reason for - and not against - considering it extremely flammable. --130.83.100.213 (talk) 12:31, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Neopentane/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The density of the molecule is incorrect, the denisity of neopentane is less than water, not greater than chloroform. http://article.pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/ppv/RPViewDoc?issn=1480-3291&volume=51&issue=13&startPage=2141

Last edited at 16:03, 26 November 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 01:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

"Neopentyl" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Neopentyl and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 27#Neopentyl until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
23:46, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply