Talk:Negligible senescence

I've done some literature searching and I can find no studies supporting any of the statements in the 2nd paragraph, and planaria are not suggested as negligibly senescence organisms as far as I can tell, so, if there are no objections, I'd like to delete that paragraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulGNelson (talk • contribs) 22:04, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

How about this 400 year old clam? http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/10/071029-oldest-clam.html

Agreed, I'll put it in the list. Darmot and gilad (talk) 11:00, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Is it too soon to add the naked mole rat to this article? http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/01/naked-mole-rats-defy-biological-law-aging https://elifesciences.org/articles/31157

Merge

I created Negligibly senescent organism (from info found at the category), before noticing this article. i am no good at merge proposals, getting it all mixed up. as long as the information is preserved, this article has the better title.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:52, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Negligible senescence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100402085711/http://8e.devbio.com/preview_article.php?ch=2&id=6 to http://8e.devbio.com/preview_article.php?ch=2&id=6
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090718221530/http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/blueplanet/factfiles/jellies/sea_anemone_bg.shtml to http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/blueplanet/factfiles/jellies/sea_anemone_bg.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)