Talk:Necessary Evil (aircraft)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

nose art edit

the hand-drawn version of the "necessary evil" nose art is terrible! can't we find the original anywhere? if not, we should just remove the rendering. imagine if wikipedia included hand-drawn maps as well. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.43.122.217 (talk) 01:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

http://www.fb-111a.net/509D.html has an image of Necessary evil's noseart painted on an F111 or theres a copy of the original artwork image here http://www.mphpa.org/classic/CG/509th-Yearbook/Pages-1/509YB_Gallery_01.htm sorry but I dont know how to get any of those put on here —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.9.202.222 (talk) 20:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Controversy over Joseph Fuoco edit

Controversy has recently erupted over a new book by Charles Pellegrino, which reports Joseph Fuoco's account that he replaced an ailing James R. Corliss as flight engineer on the Hiroshima mission. I presume the aircraft in question was this one, #91. See [1]. Beamjockey (talk) 15:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Necessary Evil (aircraft). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply