This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Nazxul is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Metal, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Black MetalWikipedia:WikiProject Black MetalTemplate:WikiProject Black MetalBlack Metal articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The "history" section had been replaced by a less informative "biography" that sounded more like PR / hype, and was far too emotive and POV. It also seemed like the "biography" was the work of a single editor whereas the "history" has been developed / refined by a number of people. So for both of those reasons I reverted to the more detailed and more wikified history text. Hope I'm not treading on anyone's toes - feel free to discuss. 152.91.9.219 (talk) 05:41, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
No, totally agree. The bio you removed was a straight cut and paste from their MySpace page. --BrianFG (talk) 22:31, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
