Talk:Natural resources of India

Natural resources of India was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 15, 2013	Good article nominee	Not listed
July 2, 2013	Good article nominee	Not listed
October 24, 2013	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Former good article nominee

India High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cairn finds 7.3 billions only in Rajasthan? edit

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-04-22/news/31382443_1_bpd-bhagyam-cairn-india-s-rajasthan

The numbers on the article need to be updated. Indian does not report its shale reserves anywhere.

-Alok 13:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alokdube (talk • contribs)

These are the oil ministry stats: http://petroleum.nic.in/petstat.pdf

-Alok 14:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alokdube (talk • contribs)

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Natural resources in India/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LT910001 (talk · contribs) 02:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'll take this review if there are no more objections. I'll start by noting I haven't had any involvement in creating or editing this article. LT90001 (talk) 02:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'd like to note at the outset that there have been two previous reviews and that this has been renominated straight away. Although the reviews were cursory in nature, there are some grammatical concerns that impact on readability that do need to be addressed. However, it's clear there has been a lot of work on this article. I'll note some concerns and then after they have been addressed continue the review:

Unless a word is a proper noun, it doesn't need to be capitalised in the middle of a sentence. This happens all over the place and was noted in GA1.
Tags such as usually go at the start of each section, rather than the end.
The lede needs to be expanded to better summarise the content of the article
This article doesn't talk about water or directly mention rare earths, which are important natural resources
This article also doesn't talk about over-consumption or resource depletion, which are important concerns that are tangentially noted.
It would be more consistent to name this article Natural resources of India I have made the move

I hope this helps. I will continue the review when these have been addressed. Kind regards, LT90001 (talk) 02:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

With no response in 12 days and no significant contributions by the nominator since August 22, I've closed this review. I encourage nomination when and only when the above criteria have been dealt with. This article has been refused nomination three times, and some issues must be dealt with if it is to be promoted. LT910001 (talk) 09:44, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

awesome edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please help me on editing because I really suck lol Bribribad53 (talk) 21:47, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

800MMT of oil reserves edit

http://makeinindia.com/sector/oil-and-gas/

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 16 external links on Natural resources of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic