Plea to be kind; predominantly single self-published source edit

I've had a reasonable scout around for third-party sources to substantiate the detail given in this article, but unfortunately the article remains predominantly reliant on WP:SELFSOURCE - the charity's own website. I've run out of time, but I would suggest that the local newspaper The Gloucestershire Echo could be a valuable third-party source. Please can editors spare some time to dig for some sources before criticising the sourcing of this article - as it stands, the article does have some very good information and makes no controversial claims. Some of this info reads a little like it was taken from a prospectus ( WP:NOTPROMOTION ) but I was unable to identify exactly where it came from in the time I had available (it reads a lot like it came from an old prospectus, or possibly a staff member). So please, editors, be kind, be helpful - this is a page about a charitable organisation that does some very good work with people with some very challenging issues. Andrew Oakley (talk) 16:28, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Reply