This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tampa Bay, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tampa BayWikipedia:WikiProject Tampa BayTemplate:WikiProject Tampa BayTampa Bay articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion
I propose that all sites within Tampa, Florida be split into a separate page called National Register of Historic Places listings in Tampa, Florida, and that the column currently used for cities on this list should be used for neighborhoods. The list is largely dominated by sites in Tampa, and would be large enough to make it's own page. -----User:DanTD (talk) 13:38, 7 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
I'm not quite sure how that would work. Can you explain better? Would this split make it easier for readers to comprehend how many historic sites there are in any given area? Is this really a split at all, or are you suggesting just a new way of ordering the same material? Thanks for any more info you can give. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 19:23, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Oh, and the reasons (why the new way would be better for the reader, or the project, than the old way). BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 19:31, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
First yes it is a split. Right now the existing list has too many sites that are just in Tampa. Second, I don't see how it would be difficult to know how the split would work. The ones in the rest of Hillsborough County would remain here, and for those in Tampa, you'd have a hatnote here. There's already a list for Miami that's separate from that of Miami-Dade County. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Seems like good reasoning. So you'd have separate lists for Hillsborough County and for Tampa, with hatnotes to the other article? If that's it, sure, so ahead. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:17, 24 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
I tagged this in October 2019. I should start working on this. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 16:17, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
UPDATE: I'm going to exclude Upper Tampa Bay Archeological District from the list, because even though the address is officially in Tampa according to Hillsborough County government websites, the Upper Tampa Bay Park still is northwest of Tampa. In the meantime I should change the location on this list. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 12:13, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
UPDATE #2; Okay, I'm done. All anybody has to do is remove the Tampa sites from this list. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 14:10, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply