Talk:National Low Income Housing Coalition
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Bangabandhu in topic Notability
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the National Low Income Housing Coalition article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contested deletion edit
Page is abundantly sourced, using all third party references. Accurately reflects references without any puffery. What, specifically, makes you think this page is promotional? --Bangabandhu (talk) 17:37, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Notability edit
The article cites many mere mentions of the subject, but I'm not seeing sufficient examples of significant, independent coverage to cleanly meet WP:NORG. That having been said, more coverage appears to be available on Google Scholar. signed, Rosguill talk 20:54, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- The sourcing isn't exhaustive, but it is adequate, and the tag isn't warranted. Per WP:NORG, Examples of substantial coverage...A scholarly article, a book passage, or ongoing media coverage focusing on a product or organization... That already exists with the journal entry that is currently referenced which describes the organization's history and it's relevance to the housing movement. And there's other references in JSTOR, as you point out. Bangabandhu (talk) 22:44, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Organizations are expected to have multiple such citations. I'm not going to start a fight if you remove the tag, but I don't think the article met that standard as written. signed, Rosguill talk 22:49, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Additional substantial, independent sources were added. Bangabandhu (talk) 05:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- Organizations are expected to have multiple such citations. I'm not going to start a fight if you remove the tag, but I don't think the article met that standard as written. signed, Rosguill talk 22:49, 26 December 2020 (UTC)