Talk:National Historic Chemical Landmarks

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved as part of WikiConference North America, 2016.

ABSOLUTE Fiction edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

all info in this article is wrong. I dont know the correct but i know it is WRONG! [[User:Designdroide|Design[[user_talk:Designdroide|droide]]]] 02:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have checked the ACS website on this matter and confirmed that the content of this article is consistent with the original content of the website. Buki ben Yogli (talk) 22:06, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I just checked the cited ACS website, which confirms that the content of this article is indeed not consistent with the truth. George Washington Carver has been dead for some time now, for example, and there's no way he could have done anything in 2005. Zacmea (talk) 09:29, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Update List and Convert to Table edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago13 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to update the "List of Landmarks." I am the program coordinator of the NHCL program, and I would like to add the Landmarks dedicated between 2008 and 2011, and reformat the list as a sortable table. The reference for this page is the official National Historic Chemical Landmarks program page, available at http://portal.acs.org/portal/PublicWebSite/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/landmarksdirectory/index.htm. Should I add a table to the Edit page for review? KLindblom (talk) 17:25, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Updating the landmarks between 2008 and 2011 would be useful. I would not be in favor of reformatting list to a table. There is not a need to sort the different items as their only attribute is the year that they were awarded. In summary I think that it would be good to update the list, but I would prefer that it remains in the format of a list. M stone (talk) 17:47, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the response. I was thinking of a table similar to List of Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmarks that included the city, state, institution, year, and brief description of each topic. City, state, and year are sortable attributes. This would make the information provided about each topic more consistent and tie to related entries. Thoughts? KLindblom (talk) 20:20, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for updating the list. Here a few things that would explain my opposition to a table:

1. I think that adding that the advantage of having the list of NHCL in Wikipedia is that it allows users to connect to relevant pages related to each NHCL. Therefore there is not a need to list all information about each institution on this page. Users can obtain the relevant information through a link.

2. The different NHCLs are very different and although a plaque is placed at a site in many cases it will be difficult to determine a relevant date or location that is related to a discovery. I think the description of why it is included of the list of NHCLs is far more important than the location of the plaque.

3. Part of my opposition is esthetic. Tables are most useful for numerical data such as population or mass. I think that a list of descriptions is the best way to maintain and display the NHCLs. M stone (talk) 21:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the feedback, and your reasoning for retaining the list makes sense to me. To your first point, I will attempt to review and update Wikipedia links for each topic, as available (links to the topic, inventor, and institution, for example). With my potential COI, I appreciate the independent review of the page to ensure its NPOV. KLindblom (talk) 17:16, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sounds like a good plan to me. M stone (talk) 14:20, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have updated Wikipedia links for the 1993-1996 topics. Please review and comment. I will review the remaining topics if this first attempt is successful. KLindblom (talk) 22:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Looks great! It takes a lot of time and effort to write these detailed descriptions. I would definitely encourage you to continue. M stone (talk) 23:59, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Updated Wikilinks for the 1997-1999 topics. KLindblom (talk) 20:45, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Updated 2000-2011 descriptions and added Wikilinks. KLindblom (talk) 22:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Added 2012 designations and provided links to individual source pages. KLindblom (talk) 22:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Page looks great. M stone (talk) 21:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Added 2014 subjects and related links and sources. KLindblom (talk) 18:26, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on National Historic Chemical Landmarks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic