The proposal for deletion of Nano Energy is like a joke to me! As I stressed my views on Teahouse, if Nano Energy is not notable, half of Wikipedia should be deleted. If it is about the Wikipedia requirement for secondary references, I can name tens of journals with the same range of references. The notability of a journal is about its reputation and performance. Scholarly journals are not celebrities to write articles about them. More than 320,000 articles have cited Nano Energy's articles. This is the notability. Instead of discussing the notability of Nano Energy, I suggest defining the notability criteria for a scholarly journal. If you found a criterion under which Nano Energy is not notable, I guarantee there are at least 100 journals which should be deleted from Wikipedia.MojoDiJi (talk) 20:04, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
- The place to discuss the notability of this article is at its AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nano Energy Meters (talk) 21:57, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
