Speedy delete was proposed edit

Apparently anyone but myself can remove the unsightly speedy delete tag if one does not believe the article falls under said speedy delete criteria. As the speedy delete tag suggests, I am writing here why I object to the speedy delete proposal:

CSD:A7 edit

A boilerplate message citing CSD:A7 (non-notable) was left on my talk page by an anonymous IP address 3 minutes after initial creation of the article stating that a speedy deletion "tag has been placed" on nanaco. In response I would like to point out:

  • There are more than 10,000 7-Eleven stores in Japan. They are owned by Seven & I Holdings along with Ito-Yokado and Denny's Japan. This is a major international conglomerate that is definitely notable.
  • It is an example usage of Sony's FeliCa chip which is the most widely used chip for contactless IC cards in Japan.
  • The Japanese version of the article, ja:nanaco, has been seen fit for existance since its creation in June 2006.
  • Similar articles have existed: Edy, Suica, PASMO, FeliCa, ICOCA, PiTaPa, etc.

CSD:G11 edit

After 15 minutes of initial article creation, a speedy delete tag was placed on the article itself for the first time. The tag stated that the article was believed to fall under CSD:G11 (blatant advertisement). The tag requests that I post an explanation in the talk page if I disagree with this assessment. Reasons why I disagree:

  • I think the more one reads this article, and the speedy delete guidelines, one would agree that this does not fall under CSD:G11:
    • e.g., this article is not blatant advertisement masquerading as an article
    • It is not written to sound like an advertisement
    • Pros are not exaggerated, cons are not hidden. It has been completely written with an objective mind.
    • Of course, not all company related articles are to be subject of speedy delete, as the policies and guidelines explain in more detail
  • The basic structure of the article was grabbed from the Edy article. Similar accusations have not been made at Edy as far as I am aware of.

For the time being I have removed the only external link in the article while the speedy tag is up, even though a link to the official website should be pretty safe. —Tokek 13:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nanaco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply