Talk:Nalpathiyonnu (41)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Rosguill in topic Duplicates an existing article
 | The contents of the Nalpathiyonnu page were merged into Nalpathiyonnu (41) on 26 February 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nalpathiyonnu (41) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Duplicates an existing article edit
This article duplicates with a reviewed article Nalpathiyonnu. One is mentioned the name in digits in and another one in words.
I would merge this but this is created before the reviewed one. Also, I believe the standing article should rename to Nalpathiyonnu (41) because it is the name used by the makers. The9Man | (talk) 10:14, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Rosguill, I would like to know your take on this. The9Man | (talk) 10:25, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- The9Man, I think you're right that the articles should be merged, and your suggested alternative title does seem appropriate based on the sources cited at Nalpathiyonnu. As for which one should be the merge target, it really doesn't matter as long as you properly attribute any merged content in an edit summary. signed, Rosguill talk 18:33, 22 February 2020 (UTC)