Text and/or other creative content from this version of Naggar was copied or moved into Naggar Castle with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because trip advisor review is copied from Naggar --Accesscrawl (talk) 03:54, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Cyphoidbomb:i didn't have any idea about WP:CWW. If I write the article in my own words. Will there be a possibility for the article to stick? Accesscrawl (talk) 04:06, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Accesscrawl: I've withdrawn the speedy deletion nomination. If you copy content from one article to another, you have to make it clear that you're copying, because we want to be able to track the full contribution history. The easiest way to do that is, at the time you copy/paste the content, to leave an edit summary to the effect of "Content copied from [article name]. See that page's history for attribution." If you forget, you should use the {{copied}} template on the talk page of the article receiving the copied content, as I have done for you above. See this edit for what I did. I think it's a generally a good idea to do both things, just to make it easier to track history. To answer your question: This article stands about as much chance as any article of sticking. You have to demonstrate that the subject is notable per our General Notability Guideline or more specifically WP:GEOFEAT, and you should bring proper reliable sources that talk about the subject. Hope that helps. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Oh, and yeah, you need to absolutely be sure that the content is written in your own words. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
