Talk:N = 2 superconformal algebra

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Robertsky in topic Requested move 7 March 2024

Requested move 7 March 2024 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Content discussion can take place separately. – robertsky (talk) 02:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply


N = 2 superconformal algebra → ? – From the title of this article it should discuss N=2 SCFT theories in general, but from its content it is clear that it addresses D=2 specifically. Please change the title to avoid confusion 2A0D:6FC2:68D1:8100:6977:DC62:EB24:BB9D (talk) 08:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Killarnee (talk) 23:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply


Note: WikiProject Mathematics and WikiProject Physics have been notified of this discussion. Killarnee (talk) 23:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply


  • Close, unless... some examples of possible titles are provided. There cannot be a positive close for this without it.--ReyHahn (talk) 09:18, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Comment: It seems to me that the title intended by proposer would be 2D N = 2 superconformal algebra as bolded in the lead. Otherwise I have no opinion on the move myself. Felix QW (talk) 09:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    In the follow up comment, the name N=2 super Virasoro algebra was proposed. What about merging this with super Virasoro algebra that already has the case N=1? ReyHahn (talk) 14:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Comments Remark: This article is not about the corresponding N=2 superconformal algebra per se but rather only about it's two-dimensional version. This is better referred to as the N=2 super Virasoro algebra. I would suggest to include the relevant text in the main article on the superconformal algebra (which at the time being mainly covers the four-dimensional case) and to delete the current article.134.95.67.184 (talk) 09:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.