Talk:NSW Women's Refuge Movement

Social Work Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Social Work, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Social Work on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Social WorkWikipedia:WikiProject Social WorkTemplate:WikiProject Social WorkSocial work articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales Low‑importance

	Australia portal NSW Women's Refuge Movement is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Some dates edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

NSW "Going home staying home" states:

On the 10th July 2012 the NSW Minister for Family and Community Services, Pru Goward, launched a 2 year program to reform the homelessness services system in NSW. The reform agenda is called Going Home, Staying Home.

(Perhaps the citation with is a date of an assessment of the program rather than the program's start? (It is of course, telling that the program is rebadged as "homelessness" rather than being directed at the problem of domestic violence.) MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:29, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Structural changes & lead section edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Rather than have only one large(ish) section in this article titled "History" I took the editorial liberty of separating it into 2 sections -- hope this is OK. I have also added a lead section & removed the "lead missing" template. Redwidgeon (talk) 03:39, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic