Talk:NBMR-3

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / Technology / Weaponry / Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Consortium edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

The Times has a story about the forming of a seven-company consortium <ref>"Joint Plan For Nato Fighter." Times [London, England] 20 Nov. 1961: 5. The Times Digital Archive. Web. 28 Oct. 2014.</ref>. At meeting at Kingston on 17 November 1961, Hawker Siddeley Group (UK), Republic Aviation Corporation (USA), Focke-Wulf (Germany), Fokker (Netherlands), Breguet (France) and SABCA and Avions Fairey of Belgium agreed to work together to develop a design for NATO. Several designs will be considered by the consortium and Fokker and Republic have already done work on an design called the "Alliance" and Hawker and Focke Wulf are working on an aircraft based on the P.1127. It also reports that BAC and Dassault are working together on the "Mirage IIIV". These consortium dont fit in the article at the moment so I will leave it here for a moment. MilborneOne (talk) 17:53, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sorry just to add a further article <ref>"Group's Plans For Nato Fighter." Times [London, England] 21 Nov. 1961: 6. The Times Digital Archive. Web. 28 Oct. 2014.</ref> says that it would be a joint effort on R&D and each would produce the aircraft ordered by the related countries. It additional mentions that Short Bros and Harland and Lockheed are also working together. MilborneOne (talk) 17:57, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

More groupings at <ref>"Keen Fight For Nato Order." Times [London, England] 16 Dec. 1961: 6. The Times Digital Archive. Web. 28 Oct. 2014.</ref> for the NBMR4 transport requirement, Hawker Siddeley/DHC/Bell/Avions Fairey/Nord Aviation and BAC(EE)/Finmeccanica/Dornier with a version of the Bristol 208. It mentions the Short/Lockheed submission for the VTOL fighter would be based on the F-104! MilborneOne (talk) 18:03, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

All good stuff, I've seen a model of the STOL F-104, a strange beast. Feel free to add, hopefully nothing will contradict what is there already and even if it does that#s not a problem. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 18:06, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

VAK? edit

Just a minor mystery, VAK apparently stood for Vertikalstartendes Aufklärungs- und Kampfflugzeug (VTOL Reconnaissance and Strike Aircraft) but why did a multi-national NATO committee give a German term for these four aircraft from Germany, Italy and the UK?!! 07:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Add topic